Should women have the same rights as men?

Now, I don\'t talk about same payment for same work. Still I talk over equality in the labor market. Still I talk over TITLES VIX, or the right of the women, to choose.

However, that is, about which I talk, the right women, that they have over it, claim into the same areas without going above that is allowed men to be shirtless. This plus the right of the Mütter, to show her/its/their nursing pictures on Facebook.

In last years and / dg/users/1qmhwsAXUAAEBTeNwQCZydtuOJQ == medium.jpg" >

from Erica Stärken-soli-superant

Best answer chosen by Asker

I still must nurse all men in public sees, but it is a quite simple equation...

Breasts are sexual objects, TOO MANY MEN.

Some men are incapable from self-control.

Can ergo to expose sexual organs, is DANGEROUSLY regardless of the one, that they are, or why.

Laws about women, who go, are bothered without drafted above in order to protect women before nascent, und/oder is abused by men sexually, who don\'t have any self-control or morals.

There are many laws, that are unfair and stupid, but they exist in order to protect us from stupid people and, to protect her/it/them from us, if we deal stupidly. If is ich\'m that sits at a red light at a crossing with 4:00 and there are not any vehicles für miles in every direction visibly, it is STUPID that sits I for the light there in order to change and had to wait. The law, that says, thereß we at red lights must hold, is for us and, to protect others of having accidents. If there is, no "others", the law doesn\'t serve any function, however we are still indebted to obey him/it. I believe, thereß I sufficiently intelligent, in order to decide, is if certainly or uncertainly es\'s to ignore a red light, but the legislators know that everyone become place a law sufficiently intelligently in place in order to make this decision. I place auf\'t, it likes, but it is the price, that I für the life into company and driving of a car must pay. We all müssen certain concessions do to live into certain manners, and certain places. If you land, laws like \'t, then, you always leave the Möglichkeit goes in the wilderness, where you can expose your breasts, and ignores red lights to the content of your heart.

Asker \'s Rating:

Asker \'s Comment:

Excellent answer..... thanks Erica.

Save to! ! RSS

Other Answers (10)

through NONAME yess, the nice i would be, you think.
but why does, woman always must boast, if his/its type of annoying likes silence for her/it/them, they boast that they can bring show her/its/their boobs because it is natural while other girls are not allowed to it. the wäre like showing pictures this original-parts, as the baby comes through it.
but also thinks i women wear shirts more than at a protective layer, because her/its/their boobs are exact tenter, and sensitively and vulnerable.

from Brenna Bear certainly why not? if not she/it beschämt over her/its/their body is and shirtless in an area wants to be, that a man according to should be, says i why not the devil? if there you matterover some areas of the world women, her/its/their breasts dot blankets anyway. and whats-Unrecht at breast, the pictures füttert? it is a schönen moment between mother and child that should be divided and at should be thought!

from Yuki Yamamoto Women, you have every right without going above and, to nurse in public. I think, if then we in the amazon weras, the women of all would do that however, her/its/their company is socially sufficiently stable. Parts of africa do this as well as australia. People are, is so sensitive against nudity.

through. .... o...! Breastfeeding is no porn! It is the natürliche way, to nourish an infant. We are Säugetiere, for Frigga, \'s-Sake!

As above for going without gives it beaches, where you can do only this. Persönlich, I dont wants each Ivan, Nikolai and Mikhail, to look at my big boobs!

through rainbow flame Mike,
I think since it that all the human being was.
we should be treated all this resembling.
Europe is bored with it
i doesn\'t see why that of U.. you cannot be.
Honestly it is 2011 and was there, 21. Century doesn\'t conserve us, only all already progress?

from Brendan, I don\'t believe in censorship. Everyone should fähig is, any picture, that she/it want, and, to announce walk bare around somewhere, they want.

from Julia C, I agree, breasts are everywhere if a fat type can show his/its husband titiies, why jargon I women show of her/its/their sexy breast!?!

through the illusory husband Europe fine for it doesn\'t see I, why we are not.

from Melancho... why is it acceptable for everyone, that was therefore exposed frankly in the media to breasts, and lives in a porn, did property of culture seize, bread feeding be looked at so ill-mannered and obscene despite the fact however, that definitely is it in the world one of the most natural matters?

InIn of my view is this because we are therefore used for the sexualised-Bild of the breasts. Brudders essentially are üste, and are typically not regarded lactating-Brüste as attractively different than the species pornography, and other media expose us to it. Männer können\'t and should not claim any breasts. that, Gegenst, isände that is intended only for her/its/their sexual satisfaction.

EindeutigEindeutig, in the west at least, it is acceptable to expose breasts into a sexual manner or sexual situations, but not for instinctive reasons? Is this a justified attitude to reception? I place auf\'t thinks with it.

from Thor of the wings of ravens

Because of his/its low class hid answer

This is stupid, first from all, we don\'t push her/it/them her/its/their breasts through the not parting from them in public shows down, I believe that it should be healthy common sense the reason why we don\'t allow them to go shirtless in public. Over the breast, that feeds pictures, why would you transfer her/it/them in the blue hell?