Why do you make some men for it, do you say this here that men reached more if Männerjargon goes through birth?

Why do you make some men for it, do you deal here as if women lost men company because women have less historically achived, and invent less, if, if nursing and pulling up of children become exist nobody in the history for women, who go through birth?

Without women, male infants never would have survided to grow up and to be capable to do all those matters.

Better than men however women don\'t claim to be because infant survival depended historically on the mother.

Men never would have been capable to do those matters if women had not gone through birth, breatsfed and pulled up children. And Männer didn\'t make you take care of women. Women worked beside Männern in feilds and harvesting, only senior class women remained at home and then smooth Oberklassenfrauen-wroked badly current households, weaving, that women, who immediately are served, sew and so on, to retain about company, and, to feed families aswell, as going through birth and pulling up of children. SieSie contriubted as well like very much to running of company as Männer.

Why so little appreciation for it?

Why does this not do, you count for everything?

Do women not claim that they are better than men because they cannot have any children, so that, why should men claim that she/it better for having invented more matters, is?

In my notion alot the people reception for granted did which women in the history.

, While convenintally, that forgets the fact women, is acces also often disputed to education or it allowed to participate in opportunities to invent matters, this possibility also had not done it. This argumnet für male superiority invalids making,

Additional details

Hannibal. Her/its/their answer made perfect sense. Es\'s only some Männer on seems you to enjoy thumbs here the defeating of any logical, appropriate argument, that no men favor automatically.

Kunzy: You/they are the \'intelligent\' type, that believes, that beauty pagents for men, in order to ogle beautiful women, is if they actually are for beautiful women, who were admired, and rewarded for her/its/their beauty, Which doesn\'t have anything with men. therefore mögen thanks for types you, why any feminsist (not I) has a problem with them.

Her/its/their answer reflects the type of intelligence, that you show with your posts in general.

I SPEECH OVER BIRTHING BABIES, WHO DON\'T DO ANY BABIES. DUH.

Pistol of displacing. Männer for women and children didn\'t provide. In itself developing companies women still do overlal more, about the family too lowermostützen.

CHECK FROM THE UN STATISTICS.

Never confuse the silly, seflish pampered modern western women with badly working women in the history.

This men\'s provider, women stay with Heimatsache, that is begun in the 1950\'ern after world war two.

In pooer families womne, to also work, has, always had.

Traditionally, women worked to provide the family as men heavily.

Read a history book.

Do, you actually don\'t understand that worked womne in the feilds,
Yes Männer had resemble none acces to education. BUT womne had less acces altogether. Giving of them a disadvanatge.

Senior class womne didn\'t laze about about it, nothing intill the 1800\'er, to do, before it from them, to help, was demanded to start the household and so on, over sees you servant aswell even as the work.

Am I the single knowledgable over the history here?

Seriously what is \'provider\', who is, with this whole wrong opinion over men?

It lets somebody ever disturb to look at un statistics or to read over him/it, which on in itself developing countries goes.

It is not looked after WOMEN by men.

Men\'s men contribute merely to the rise of her/its/their offspring. But entire less than women.

A luxury, that the most womne has today not even today, is women, who remain at home to pull up babies.

Is everyone on here this spolit and pamper, they don\'t understand the realities of the life for most people?

MEN MACHEN NOT AND NEVER WORRIED CREDITS FOR WOMEN.

ONLY A SMALL NUMBER OF WOMNE HAT BENEFITED VON IT.

SERIOSULY BEKOMMT AN EDUCATION.

I didn\'t say that is wo0mne better. I boasted, thereß womne men like is and reached, as well like muich however gets me I from the say that is womne better, al this peoleaccuing.

IS * * * * * * * MEN, THAT OF WOMNE GEHEN AORUND SAYING, BETTER THWEN ARE IF A WOM,NE ANYHTING-GUTES SAYS BETTER ABOUT THAT, WHAT BECOMES WOMNE AHVE DOINE, THAT YOU/THEY ACCUSED OF THE SDAYING WOMNE, IS.

WHEN DID I SAY ONCE THAT BETTER THAN MEN IST OF WOMNEN HUH?

EVERYTHING, WHICH I DID, WAS OPINION THAT OF THATTHEY GEWT-ANERKENNUNG FOR WHATT SOLLTE, HELLO CREDITS YOU/THEY CONTIRUBTED ZU IN THE HISTORY TO MEN GLEICH.

THE PERSON WHOP SAGTE I, THAT DONBT VIEL KNOWS ABOUT THE HISTORY. THE WOMNE IN THE NHOME began THE 1950 FRÜHER AUßER INTILL\'S WOMNBE STILL; HAD CROPS, TOO MUCH HIGH INSTALLMENTS TO WORKS, THAT OR TENDS, VEGETABLE GARDENS NEAR HOME ETC, OVERLAL, THAT SO MUCH AS WELL AS MEN WEITER TO SORGENDEM MEAL FOR THE FASMILY BEITRÄGT.

OH AND THE LARGEST PART OF JÄGER-GATHERE-NAHRUNGEN CO9MES OF ROOTS AND NON-MEAT. THEREFORE, WOMNE DEN PUTS GROßTEIL DES FOOD READY. BUT MNEAT HAT ERNÄHRUNGS-WERT. THEY DO FROM MÄNNERN UND WOMNES CONTRIBUTION EQUATE.

I WAS SYAING-MÄNNER, AND WOMNE IST BOTH PROVIDERS. IT is UNFAIUR MPut SOCIETRS IN HUNTER EBENSO WELL gathers to name ÄNNERN PROVIDER, IF WOMEN TRAQDTIONALLY have, to the disposal LIKE VERY MUCH to call MNE PROVERDS, SEXZITY. is to be called THEM, PROTECTERS is not. I EVER DISPUTED, THEREß MEN MERCHANDISE PROTECTOR?

AND YPOU EWND YOU/THEY SATTEMNET MIT ALL OWMNE WNAT, ABOUT BTETER ZU, AS MEN, IS?

THATS WIE I AL MEN THINBK OWMNE SHOUL TO SAY, SEXS-GEGENSTÄNDE IS.

YOU/THEY MEN AUF HERE IS THE ONE, THE SAY, THAT OF MNE BESSER AND AL, THAT OF EQUALIT ATTEMPT I TO POIINT FROM, IS,

through soul

Best answer chosen by Asker

Men believe that she/it the existence of strong, and women overlook is. You/they placed also women as beyelet of Satans into any Mythologie\'s, like Pandora\'s crate.

Therefore, it believes in REALLY short words, men, that women must demand from men to survive, overlooked her/its/their existence, and stories of it do.

Source(s,:

Now, my brain for a hint.

Asker \'s Comment:: Was everything, for which I made point from something, women did and said that they are same for men and how many people, attack me and deal like me, said, that women were better? Still types on obviously calls you here, Männer improves, and nobody says everything.

FACT: Men and meals made available womne immediately in Jäger-gatherer-socities.

Save to! ! RSS

Source(s,:

go back to the kitchen, WOMAN,

process, u means fugly-Feministinnen like it

from George In lives, it is difficult for one however to create everything. More frequently than every individual performance, it cannot be connected to help, that is gotten at any time.

vonvon Darwinsk... the answer to this question is at the end of this video

through cece1012... what I wish people, would assume, is, that both sexes need each other, period.

through Missy Ein and left me ask you a question: Are feminists only the diarrhea of God?

What no answer?

That is what I thought.

from Salvatio..., so that you want a cookie or something?

from Jack, I think highly of women. I schetch also family and child birth. But, to say this child birth, you should get alone, thereß any type of particular attention is displaced.

Dogs and cats can multiply. The being fpoints get ähig, doesn to reproduzieren\'t from me. Women, who want respect, should deal like civilized people.

I respect women as people. I also expect, thereß women on a manner from it worthily deals, that this respect. Property over 99 do percent of them. Not a problem. But some women, like some M,änner is middle and hateful and not with totally acting on a manner worthy of respect.

Child birth is difficult besides it. But it is not anything, which should compare itself with it, fähig, to be, to count, loves, invents you or respects. Even an illness can multiply.

through stealth_.... if it was not for men, we would not be capable to go through birth. When doing babies, if people occur, demands both sexes. Women didn\'t makes all those babies through itself.

No sex is to the others and both thinks, a quantity contributed to company.

vonvon RAPTASTI.... in the word is from Tupac Shakur:

"And because we all came from a woman,
It got our name of a woman and our game of a woman
I wonder why we take from our wives,
Why we rape our wives, do we hate our wives?
I believe that it time to kill for our wives, is,
Time to heal our wives is real to our wives
And if we don\'t do, we will have a race of the babies
The ladies, that the babies do, will hate this
And because a man cannot do one,
He/it doesn\'t have any right to tell a woman if and, where one is to be managed,
So, the real men will get up
I know that you are fed at ladies, but upholds your head"

from Louise C, I believe, that role is women as important as men in retaining company, and I agree that both are equally necessary for the human race\'s survival. And it is certain true, thereß Frauen\'s, that economic contribution will often overlook to company.

But it is true that most of the big inventors, scientists were men and so on, and I believe that it is true, that there are more exceptionally shiny men, as exceptionally shiny women.

But I don\'t think, that this is so important in general, I believe that the average man is no more intelligent one, as the average woman.

I believe that it is an exaggeration to be said that women, who remained at home, in whom 1950s began. The seperation of home and job of the occured, as a result of the industrial revolution meant, thereß the home came s-Reich in the early one(s) in 1800s in order to be seen as the woman although there were of course many married women, who calm, who must be done for a living, but, to work instead of at home, had to go out normally like in bygone times would have been.

through namenotp.... you get really not that there is, & has been women from there this you always believes, that they are supperior to men. And thereß should be lign* uped after them, & that men should be used as pets, her/its/their friends or love interest, oh & fyi if you don\'t have any control over it, if you have sex, & only your partner does, you are a pet, slaves, those, that tell her/it/them, what, to be done, & b***h with, & took servants into the teachings, those that they will do her/its/their hair like who & accommodate, you hold for her/it/them tiresome work, yes it gives some men, who think the same way, & always has been, much less now then what was, but there is still a good this 30 percent of us still is like it, & the percent is slopes higher on which part of the world or the country, in which you live, but, to say, that it NO women, who believe, that they are better or supperior, gives to men. Sie\'wieder the being delusional. There are women from there this, this Punktl becomes for youücke tells, no misunderstandings over it. You/they believe, thereß we she/it here should serve. And that is our work.

You/they don\'t seem to know much of the history if you think that the male provider, with women, that at home matter in 1. detains, began in the 50\'ern. women were no J in most culturesägerinnen. Männer was that meant almost everything not vegetative or plants like meal, came from the efforts of the men, that provide, that for her/it/them. Espeically if your talk over big game. It was a man, that it to the Verfügung put. Women women didn\'t can to the Lebensmittelgeschäft goes & lifts you meal for her/it/them in order to eat. I hope, thereß you this understands? Männer prepared also defense of other men & wild animals. Natürlich with this, if it didn\'t give her any men in order to defend against it, no need of it would be. But für our species, in order to survive of course, must be men for her & women.

It is with birth where women are forced biologically to carry the child, one of those matters. And it biologically then is connected in order to take care of ihn/es after child birth. Es\'s not, thereß men not for the child can provide. Es\'s only a lot like the physical Stärkensache. Women können huntresses is, & can lift matters she/it & can do compulsory labor, if they really take the trouble & insist on that occasion. It comes only natürlicher & is easier for men. Same matter goes für lifting children. Männer places auf\'t has the biological pheromones, that fortifies her/it/them at her/its/their children, because the child was not nine months long in her/its/their bodies. And the Männer shouldn\'t is accused for it. Now in some women dort\'s any type of biological Funktionsstörung & this doesn\'t make any difference for her/it/them if it occurs to nurse her/its/their children. But this whole matter can be repaired by science, if very much scientists per the way a kit creates ünstlichen womb that they created an artificial heart, & artificial organs. InIn this case if or if ever is allowed him/it to happen, the woman becomes no größere connection with the child has. And they don\'t become fähig is to be claimed rights to it, whether the child should be alive or dies, because es\'s in her/its/their body. And if you land, \'t thinks, thereß this possible is, nobody believed that artificial hearts also were possible. Therefore, it is möglich. Everything, which for confident women, it must be made that es\'s in her/its/their best interest in order to bring a child to her/its/their eggs & her/its/their partner seminal fluid & brand & it, came into an artificial womb instead of into her/it/them to concept. Most people würden this not for traditional religious reasons in consideration pulls. And many women wouldn\'t likes it, because removes it w much leverageürde & races that has her/it/them because of the child birth process. It würde questions like abortion completely changes, & child support. And women weras no more capable, to claim, she/it those two questions with what claims. SchlieIt is ßlich of course & her/its/their election still should be whether they, the route, want to go. And it shouldn\'t is forced on them. Some wäre against it, because they are naturalists. Others für traditional religious reasons. And others, that are female, because they only land, the power, that she/it therefore have, wants to give up \'t. And place auf\'t wants to do matters same between the sexes.

Of course, this same question can be mentioned with men in sense on physical strength. Persönlich i\'d loves for women to be physically stronger. Cause then i h wouldn\'tört this the wail always & all these laws built this is harsher in sense on men on physical actions. This way, as women placed for them the same quantity of effort in some phyisically, causes \'d the same quantity of damage. Therefore, as women beat you instead of the wall, if sie\'wieder bös or controling even complete is forced the Wegmänner to do. Es\'s not O.K., because well oh is not she/it as physically strong, & it doesn\'t hurt very much as it. Therefore she/it doesn\'t muß itself the way, that a man does, physically & therefore mentally controls. ICH\'m, that doesn\'t say, it doesn\'t should any automatic check für both sexes in this regard cause there gives, should be. But women seem physically allowed to become to work off, because not sie\'wieder as physically strong & it seems to be social O.K. in order to meet men as it would be no O.K. one(s) in order to meet women.

Now don\'t get me, wrong women have her/its/their own matters. You/they always shave which wouldn i überall\'t wants to it or troubles to make. You/they take hours, that take care of this, like which they look. But that is again another social matter. And not something, which happens, muß.

Finally, whoever is scared more in order to be same, the question is. And i thinks es\'s-Frauen. depth down, that she/it put on, \'t wants equality. Deep down, that she/it special his/its wants, & delivered the foods and beverages to it, because they are special. A problem with it has now i-Don\'t as it, you yearn as her/it, you don\'t take advantage of it & influences the laws to do it, so that men are therefore punished. Most Mlikes to think änner of women as it to be special, & other. You/they place only auf\'t in order to court wants taken &, to do socially sore because of her/its/their differences. But as far as this women wants to be different as Männer more es\'s-Frauen. ways of the advantages, that come with those differences.

through pistol fanatics ["however doesn\'t claim women better than men to be\']

BS.. it gives many women from there the claiming, as women are the "more virtuous sex, because they can give "lives, you the fact" ignores completely, that there is not any baby without men either. It takes two.

["Without women never would have male infants survided to grow up and to be capable to do all those matters."]

Without men & fathers that protects & no one of them for the mothers & the children prepare, a chance of survival would stand, and most likely is killed by wild animals away.

["And men didn\'t "take care of women"]

Did they actually do, do you wonder ever, why men were, and are the primary breadwinners of the family still?

[smooths you Oberklassenfrauen-wroked badly current households then, weaving, that sews and so on,"]

Senior class women have maids and servants to make those matters for her/it/them.. you had to lift not even a finger.

["During convenintally, that forgets the fact women, also often disputed acces to education is or it allowed to participate in opportunities to invent matters, this possibility also had not done it. Doing of this argumnet für male superiority invalids"]

Also access to those matters was denied most men & boys in the past. AusbildungenAusbildungen and those other matters, that you erwähnen, was to the is enough and privileged class only available.. with it your points is, piles up.

You/they ignore also everything of the responsibilities and the needs, that men must look. expect, for example, to work, für her/its/their countries, to provide her/its/their families, the fight and the die, you get the use as cannon feed and makes the whole hard/dangerous-Aufgabe and so on..

["CHECK FROM THE UN STATISTICS"]

The UN is bothered with Liberal/Leftist/Feminist-Tagesordnungen, feminists let even her/its/their very own branch named within the UN UNIFEM. Therefore, why should I remove them any stats seriously?

well, I don\'t read everything of this from Arlo, but the say, that men would not have been capable is relative to be done those matters "if women didn\'t give any birth" with the say, we should not look down on caretakers, because everyone makes her/its/their part in order to help to hold together company, and all occupations are going \'approximately finally necessary to keep the world. es\'s true, and it is the more aufgeklärte point of view, in the sense, that we all help each other and should not compete for statuses with each other.

But, if feminists indicate, that women are somehow superior, because they are capable for birth, you are the one the beginning of the "competition for Statusspiel. And this argument is really quite lächerlich, because, if you think about it, women really Hafen\'t made all extraordinary one there. I my yes, das\'s nice, thereß you a life in this world brought, and, to carry another person into your body, really is quite strange in our modern world of businesses and luxury, but really women have, who give birth, done nothing, which cannot do this half of the human race. And Frauendon\'t weiß real, which, they really don\'t have themselves very severely solicitous to do it, they do, it is only something, which her/its/their bodies make alone. Es\'s relative with a man, that itself rühmt, because he/it can do seminal fluid. If you want to compare performances, it really makes a quantity to more sense to brag with it to reach something he/it the majority of the Leute-Dose\'t does.

from Sarafina, I cannot believe some of the answers. , To pull up children, muß one of the hardest works in the world is. Particularly babies, that you each 2-3 füttern must. I schetch mommies very much, and, how roughly the back then worked women are insane. Yes takes it two, in order to do a child, but the woman is this a being pregnant, she/it is the one giving birth, she/it is on the one with 3, ern,ährt the baby. Still, Es\'s a 24 hour of work, in which you don\'t get any good sleep, are paid for you.

Because of his/its low class hid answer

Her/its/their right. A lot of the inventions, that in frwas mentioned üheren posts, is from men. It seems, thereß these inventions actually for women was, but it seems that the man profits also from them.

Therefore, why depressed women & opinion, that they don\'t contribute so much as well as men.
Women are very strong & independent nowadays. And without women weras we not capable, to increase us. Women could say F * * * it lifted none children anyomore.

from Hannibal the cannibal

Because of his/its low class hid answer

These are all good points, and I told myself to them in the past.

However, it is quite easy to spend your time in the course of timeing if you reject your wife an education and they have cooking, cleaning and providing for the children. If I can this type of Umständen gets, where I have only one duty to me and select somebody after me upward, have?

PROCESS: And along 5 thumbs in record time! Wow, ich\'m surprised... here believed I, that I declared only the obvious,: that leaving leaves behind me frankly a servant reception worry of me for other prosecutions.

Source(s,:

the complaint of one woman

breastfeeding facts

Friday, 22 July 2011